Skip to main content
Nevada Law Journal
Home
Issues
Volume 25 | 2024-2025
Volume 24 | 2023-2024
Volume 23 | 2022-2023
Volume 22 | 2021-2022
Volume 21 | 2020-2021
Volume 20 | 2019-2020
Volume 19 | 2018-2019
Volume 18 | 2017-2018
Volume 16 | 2015-2016
Volume 15 | 2014-2015
Volume 14 | 2013-2014
Volume 13 | 2012-2013
Volume 12 | 2011-2012
Volume 11 | 2010-2011
Volume 10 | 2009-2010
Volume 9 | 2008-2009
Volume 8 | 2007-2008
Volume 7 | 2006-2007
Volume 6 | 2005-2006
Volume 5 | 2004-2005
Volume 4 | 2003-2004
Volume 3 | 2002-2003
Volume 2 | 2001-2002
Volume 1 | 2000-2001
Forum
Forum | 2023-2024
Forum | 2022-2023
Forum | 2021-2022
Forum | 2020-2021
Forum | 2019-2020
Forum | 2018-2019
Forum | 2017-2018
Forum | 2016-2017
White Papers
Nevada Law
Forthcoming Articles
Symposium
UNLV Law
UNLV Law Journals
Masthead
Bylaws
Prospective Members
Submissions
Subscriptions
Contact Us
Breadcrumb
Home
Nevada Law Journal
Volume 6 | 2005-2006
Is Multidistrict Litigation a Just and Efficient Consolidation Technique? Using Diet Drug Litigation As a Model To Answer This Question
Note | Volume 6 | 2005-2006
January 1, 2006
Is Multidistrict Litigation a Just and Efficient Consolidation Technique? Using Diet Drug Litigation as a Model to Answer this Question
Download PDF
by
Danielle Oakley
Citation:
6 Nev. L.J. 494 (2005-2006).
